http://boards.aetv.com/forum/Should-Police-Be/247 The Innocent Project is a national litigation and public policy organization dedicated to exonerating wrongfully convicted people though DNA testing and reforming the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice. Check out our Web Exclusives for more about the Innocence Project. en LiveForums Enterprise 4.1.2 (www.liveworld.com) Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:53:37 -0800 28 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/No/700016541 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/No/700016541 A dna sample should be obtained in the same way a warrant is issued - by a judge deciding if there's just cause. Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:11:17 -0700 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:11:17 -0700 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:47:23 -0700 4 Mr.Squanky 3 700058640 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Yes/500010214 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Yes/500010214 If the police had enough evidence against a person, then YES! They should be able to demand a DNA sample. If they don't have enough evidence, then Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:50:08 -0800 Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:50:08 -0800 Tue, 12 May 2009 18:25:04 -0700 5 SassyBlueEyes 4 500013153 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Should-Police-Be/500005257 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Should-Police-Be/500005257 Yes, they should because after all it's about truth and justice. Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:08:49 -0700 Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:08:49 -0700 Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:42:37 -0700 19 edwardd 18 500005689 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Well/700006638 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Well/700006638 If they are truely innocent then why hesitate to give one? If they refuse that's when the police tend to focus on them as a prime suspect! DNA at Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:14:52 -0700 Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:14:52 -0700 Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:14:52 -0700 1 najia 0 700026352 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna-Birth/12924 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna-Birth/12924 I think that DNA & finger prints should be collected at birth and added to a "World Wide Database". It would limit "Cold Cases" & give police Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:28:49 -0700 Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:28:49 -0700 Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:42:16 -0700 27 Darzzie29 26 145593 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna-Samples/800003442 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna-Samples/800003442 yes,,if one is not guilty why should they not give a sample? Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:56:11 -0700 Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:56:11 -0700 Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:09:55 -0700 2 feathersinrain64 1 800016413 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/If/500003373 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/If/500003373 If there is probable cause Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:12:31 -0700 Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:12:31 -0700 Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:12:41 -0800 2 1 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna-On-Discovry/500008534 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna-On-Discovry/500008534 i watched on the discovery chanel where some people have 2 different DNA's. so when we release some one based on thier DNA we may be releaseing a Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:48:43 -0800 Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:48:43 -0800 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:59:08 -0800 3 karenjclick 2 500010695 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna/500009077 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna/500009077 I believe that the first step should of course be to ASK someone to give their DNA. If it is explaned to them that it is to clear their name from a Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:08:16 -0800 Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:08:16 -0800 Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:08:16 -0800 1 emma2080 0 500011548 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna-Without-Approvalabsolutely/500008934 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Police-Be/Dna-Without-Approvalabsolutely/500008934 Yes, they should take Dna Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:04:57 -0800 Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:04:57 -0800 Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:04:57 -0800 1 heartman 0 500011320