http://boards.aetv.com/forum/Should-Law-Enforcement/258 AETV Community Center: Recent Topics in Should law enforcement be required to maintain a national databank containing the DNA of all unidentified bodies? en LiveForums Enterprise 4.1.2 (www.liveworld.com) Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:20:21 -0800 32 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/National-Databank-Of/500008734 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/National-Databank-Of/500008734 I definately think there should be a record of the DNA samples of all the unidentified bodies recovered in the U.S "and" Canada...simply b/c of the Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:27:08 -0800 Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:27:08 -0800 Tue, 12 May 2009 18:26:01 -0700 7 IceBlueEyes2032 6 500010960 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Probably/700016545 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Probably/700016545 Sounds like a good idea to me. I think doing all we can to put names with faces is doing the right thing. Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:23:46 -0700 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:23:46 -0700 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:23:46 -0700 1 Mr.Squanky 0 700058640 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Of-Course/700006686 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Of-Course/700006686 This would be a big help in hopefully id-ing the body and catching a killer. I think it should be a requirement for all states. Just because you find Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:57:18 -0700 Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:57:18 -0700 Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:47:25 -0700 7 najia 6 700026352 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Dna-On-All/600000866 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Dna-On-All/600000866 Should law enforcement be required to maintain a national databank containing DNA of all unidentified bodies? Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:20:28 -0800 Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:20:28 -0800 Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:32:27 -0700 3 croot06 2 500013871 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Yes/700002906 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Yes/700002906 I think it would help greatly with solving cold cases. Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:04:33 -0800 Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:04:33 -0800 Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:04:33 -0800 1 AQHAGirl 0 700013443 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Dna-Database-Of/700002902 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Dna-Database-Of/700002902 I belive we should have the database. In this day and age, with all the technology we have, being able to give a family closure by identifying Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:24:06 -0800 Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:24:06 -0800 Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:25:44 -0800 2 Dewy 1 700013429 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/I-Think-So/500008939 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/I-Think-So/500008939 Because you never know when you might need the DNA, or perhaps two bodies match, and it will help you in the case. Any extra information to solve a Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:07:43 -0800 Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:07:43 -0800 Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:07:43 -0800 1 Kate_the_Blade 0 500011323 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/National-Dna-Databank/500008431 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/National-Dna-Databank/500008431 Absolutely! There would be a better chance of identifying them. Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:03:48 -0800 Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:03:48 -0800 Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:03:48 -0800 1 penguin182002 0 500010514 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/National-Database-Of/500008430 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/National-Database-Of/500008430 Absolutely there should be a national database. Without one people who commit crimes of murder have a huge loop hole to walk right through. It is Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:00:00 -0800 Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:00:00 -0800 Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:00:00 -0800 1 jlmx2 0 500010513 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Data-Bank-Unidentified/500008409 http://boards.aetv.com/topic/Should-Law-Enforcement/Data-Bank-Unidentified/500008409 Yes they should. I also believe anyone that convicted for any crime and is in prison should have a DNA done and that should also be placed in a Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:03:51 -0800 Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:03:51 -0800 Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:29:54 -0800 2 jdcroll 1 500010496