|
Posts:
5
Registered:
8/13/07
|
|
(4 of 4)
Re: Marty Tankleff's innocent or guilty?
Aug 13, 2007 12:20 PM
|
|
i do not think that mary tankleff is guilty i think he was framed due to the fact that he had a good life and his parents were very popular. i think it was really strange that the police of all people would try and make it to where he would go to jail no matter what they had to do. i think it was them trying to prove a point to marty that they could actually do it and get away with it. i think there was a bad cop situation. and i think he was framed. and that he should get a chance to tell his story with just the judge and him no one else. and marty should have had a lawyer present when police were questioning him due to the fact that he was pushed into thinking he killed his parents. like i said i think there was some bad cop business going on. when i watched this show i really wanted to come through the tv and knock some people out. especially when you know he is innocent. a guy like marty doesn't seem or you don't get the vibe from him that he would want to kill his parents. especially when everyone knew what his parents ment to him. .....HE IS INNOCENT!!!!!
|
|
|
Posts:
4
From:
USA
Registered:
8/9/07
|
|
(3 of 4)
Re: Marty Tankleff's innocent or guilty?
Aug 9, 2007 7:22 PM
|
MikeA needs to base his opinion on more than just a 60 min show on TV.........
MARTY IS INNOCENT>>>>>>>>
The biz partner hired thugs to kill the Tankleff's, and everybody else covered it up!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Posts:
6
From:
California
Registered:
8/9/07
|
|
(2 of 4)
Re: Marty Tankleff's innocent or guilty?
Aug 9, 2007 4:06 AM
|
I am sure all the messages listed below proclaiming Martins innocents are either friends or relatives and paid attorneys or an attorney trying to make a name for himself. I watched the show tonight and given all the examples of evidence and witnesses.
I firmly believe Martin is involved in the murders. Unless everyone has lost their marbles ( The man confessed to the murders) and i do not believe he was pressured in any way, no one would admit to killing their parents unless they truely did. Bottom Line!
And i did not fall for the acting he portrayed on the stand - If you looked closely he never blinked or moved his eyes duing that statement and it would appear to me that his testimoney was fake and well rehearsed.
and now some big time attorney trying to make an OJ Simpson trial come to life again is trying desperately to get Martin freed. Out of Ignorance, and greed and for the publisity.
Not happening, god i hope, persons with extreme legal intelegence handles this case agressively, I am so worried they might free this murderer by using some stupid loop-hole or something. I believe somehow from watching the show that both the Uncle and Martin had something to do with the murders, I believe the Uncle may have had some kind of pack with Martin and money was involved. But, trust me you free this guilty man and I believe hole hartedly that you will be freeing a murderer.
Shame on you Martin, poor greedy soul. I am a very good judge of character and I believe Martin is a narcistic individual and completely manipulative. I believe he should pay dearly for his crime, Yes Martin is Guilty.
|
|
|
Posts:
4
From:
Ontario Canada
Registered:
8/7/07
|
|
(1 of 4)
Marty Tankleff's innocent or guilty?
Aug 8, 2007 3:15 PM
|
I think that he did not have a chance at all. He should have had a lawyer at the start. There should not have been any interogation untill a lawyer was present. The cops lieing was a set up.
They also did not even investigate the case at all from there. His innocents or guilt is not proven, as the case is based on lies, and intimidation. He was in shock, and needed an adult to be with him. We all handle shock differently, and the fact that he did not cry should not be looked at. He was a child and they did not have an adult or lawyer with him, and lied, he just said what they wanted to hear.
There is evidence that was discovered after the trial, and then was considered with biases. If this man did not do this crime, the real killer is still free. Do the police and courts really want a killer free? I think they are just covering their butts, and do not want to admit that mistakes were made. So a man still sits in jail that may be inocent, and did not get a fair shake when first interviewed. There are too many inconsistancies, with this case. Not only with Marty, but the other suspects. Do innocent men normally set up their deaths and run? He really needs to be looked at. And the men that went to the house, and came out with blood on them, were not looked into enough. Where was this evidence at the first trial? If someone admits to a crime, there still needs to be an investigation to colaberate their story. Was this done?
This kid only admited he did it after a lie. He did not admit it fully, and none of this should have been admisable, as he was a child and did not have an advocate present. Children should not be interogated without an advocate present. 17 is still a child. Think about what you know now and what you thought you knew at 17. Were you capable to be interogated if your parents were killed like that?
He was screwed by the system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
