Since you are devoted members of the A&E community, we’d like to let you know of some changes that will be taking place on our network discussion boards. Coming this October, we will be moving the A&E discussion boards to an easier, more flexible platform. This exciting update will allow us to improve and expand your experience as a user with improved board functionality and robust member profiles. When the new community is ready, we will be turning off the ability to post here, but you’ll still be able to read the current boards. We have also set up a forum where we’ll be answering questions about the upcoming transition.
Stay tuned for more details in the next few weeks. We will be sure to keep you updated as we make the transition.
|
Posts:
4
Registered:
5/23/05
|
|
(2 of 2)
May 24, 2005 6:33 PM
|
|
Well it depends what type of criminal offense this person committed. If they committed a murder then my answer would be no if it was a minor offense then yes.
|
|
|
Posts:
6
Registered:
3/17/05
|
|
(1 of 2)
Mar 17, 2005 10:21 PM
|
This method is how many crminals being held for lesser crimes are caught for the big crime. They are put on ice for something minor and bunked with an informant to see if they will talk about the crime they are really wanted for.
This is the government's oldest method of getting information-spying.
I don't think informants should get anything for informing because they are no better than the person they are snitching on.
However, valuable information comes, as it should, at some cost. So I think they should get a priviledge or money in their account. They should also be held to a higher standard of behavior as well if they want to continue getting priviledges.
They should not get less time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
